Dalma Galfi vs Ashlyn Krueger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Oct at 04:47 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Galfi vs A. Krueger

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Galfi 1 - 0 Krueger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dalma Galfi winning 2 and Ashlyn Krueger winning 0. The last match between Dalma Galfi and Ashlyn Krueger was at the Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo, 18-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Dalma Galfi getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Galfi | 1 |
| Krueger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo(10-18-25)
D. Galfi vs A. Krueger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,285,612 | Career Prize Money | $1,512,233 |
| 58.09% (352-254) | Career Total W/L | 55.71% (161-128) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.84% (21-22) |
D. Galfi vs A. Krueger Match Preview:
- How do the players' second serve performances compare recently? Ashlyn Krueger has a lower second serve point win rate at 40.49%, while Dalma Galfi performs slightly better at 42.84%.
- In return games, Krueger is more effective against opponents' second serves, winning 48.17%, compared to Galfi's 46.94%. On first serve returns, Krueger maintains her edge with a 31.38% success rate against Galfi's 28.91%.
- Under pressure, Galfi is more proficient, saving 55.81% of breakpoints, slightly better than Krueger's 52.73% save rate. Could this make a difference during critical moments?
- In the last year, match performance favors Galfi, who has secured 64.18% wins, significantly higher than Krueger's 49.02%.
- Both players perform best on grass with a 58% win rate. However, both struggle on indoor hard courts, with Krueger at 43% and Galfi at 46%.
- Krueger has more experience on the Main tour, winning 55.56% of matches, while Galfi's success primarily comes from lower-tier events, boasting a 68.29% win rate.
- Krueger faces tougher opponents on average, with opponents ranked around 66.22 compared to Galfi's less challenging field of 196.4.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Krueger has a historical advantage, winning 59% compared to Galfi’s 50% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 18, 2025, UTC):
As we prepare for the upcoming match between Ashlyn Krueger and Dalma Galfi, the statistics offer intriguing insights. Krueger demonstrates a superior ability to return both first and second serves, which may prove advantageous in disrupting Galfi's offensive play.
Conversely, Galfi excels in high-pressure situations with a better breakpoint save percentage. This mental toughness could be pivotal in tight scenarios, potentially swinging the match in her favor.
Considering the overall performance trends from the past year, Galfi has shown a higher consistency in securing victories across her matches. However, her success has come at lower-tier events, contrasting with Krueger's experience on the main circuit against tougher opponents.
Factoring in all dynamics, including Krueger's proficiency in deciding sets and her exposure to higher-ranked competition, it seems she might possess the slight edge in this encounter.
Thus, based on the current data, Ashlyn Krueger is predicted to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Dalma Galfi vs Ashlyn Krueger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Galfi vs A. Krueger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Galfi Recent Matches Played
A. Krueger Recent Matches Played

D. Galfi vs A. Krueger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.09% (352/254) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.71% (161/128) |
| 57.14% (792/594) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.04% (361/307) |
| 52.97% (6729/5974) | Games Win/Loss | 51.47% (3214/3031) |
| 61.78% (139/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.19% (109/85) |
| 57.43% (143/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.84% (34/28) |
| 48.89% (44/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 61.90% (26/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.69% (15/11) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1759 | Aces Total | 772 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1594 | Total Double Faults | 1193 |
| 1:26:16 | Average Match Time | 1:33:25 |
| 441.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.56 |
| 62% (22873/36628) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12255/19117) |
| 65% (14811/22873) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (7759/12255) |
| 46% (6308/13755) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3037/6862) |
| 47% (2106/4450) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1056/2332) |
| 44% (16655/37503) | Return Points Win % | 44% (8569/19265) |
| 50.00% (26/26) | Slam W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 50.00% (13/13) | Masters W/L | 50.91% (28/27) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.21% (33/40) | Main Tour W/L | 54.05% (40/34) |
| 59.59% (233/158) | Challenger W/L | 60.34% (70/46) |
| 85.11% (40/7) | Futures W/L | 61.11% (11/7) |
| 59% (346/585) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (157/285) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (69/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (36/67) |
| 53% (100/190) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (50/93) |
| 86% (347/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (160/134) |
| 14% (347/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (160/25) |
| 22% (259/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (129/25) |